Immediate requests	Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Wikipedians looking for help	0
Requests for unblock	19
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests	56
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests	63
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests	10
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests	98
Requested RD1 redactions	1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	0
Candidates for speedy deletion	35
Open sockpuppet investigations	60
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review

Requests for unblock

SPI cases awaiting administration

Template:Admin dashboard

Template:Admin dashboard/light

Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox

Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

Wikipedia:Closure requests

Wikipedia:Files for discussion

Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Wikipedia:Requested moves

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot

Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion	Entries
Attack pages	0
Copyright violations	0
Hoaxes	0
Vandalism	0
User requested	8
Empty articles	0
Nonsense pages	0
Spam pages	10
Importance or significance not asserted	1
Possibly contested candidates	5
Other candidates	27

The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:

( source / chronological order / expired )

Category:Expired proposed deletions

Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 94 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

Absoluterizzlerrfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "f\.?c\.?$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Note on file "FC" is an abbreviation of "Football Club" -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

STEW5Tkyebkjabchwdebcjhbwd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Stevie May Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

HIieopafsjoafeuohbqeoukjfwa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Arsetn3r (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "arse" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

TurtlesThatGoAllTheWayDown (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:00, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:00, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Username4325 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

ARealusernamehere (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Ajndrewbrightlopezbrandon (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

2441myteenagecoffinbirth..oe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Hawktuahgawk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "hawk[- ]?(tuah|tuhh)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file sexual innuendo relating to spitting on a penis -- DQB (owner / report) 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Tito Calderón (La Dinastía) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

OfficialGoober (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikibot1112 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "bot ?[0-9]*$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file Name may imply an unauthorized bot. Do not block accounts in which the "bot" suffix arises naturally -- DQB (owner / report) 18:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

TrollingUssr12A (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "troll" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

*: User has vandalized. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:14, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

TDestroyer188999 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "destroy" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

VideoGameDevelopers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(admin|coordinator|bureaucrat|check *user|developer|moderator|oversight|steward|sysop|committee|staff)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file Name may imply a position of authority -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

JUSTLETMEUSEMYUSERNAME (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Disgustedfog34 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "disgust" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Arethereanyusernames (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Greatdetroitforthepepleofmi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

TylerTheMagnoliaPicturesFan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

TylerTheMagnoliaPicturesuser (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

WikeyPikey (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "pikey" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

HistoryHiveRationalNumber (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

Digbick6999 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Anagram of sexually vulgar username ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. --[f[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] (TALK
PAGE) 20:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Ardizi Design (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – This is a violation as clearly a promotional username. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
@ScrabbleTiles Wait until the user edits. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Is this true for all reports? ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
@ScrabbleTiles See the box above. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks. and Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional. (evidence usually means that they have edited promoting the same company their username represents) --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Barbara federica scremin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See UTP. Aydo h8^[contribs] 16:15, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Shapearts (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. C F A 16:34, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. They haven't made an edit since this was broughtr up on their talk page four days ago. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 19:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Chngbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username suggests a bot. Ravensfire (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. They don't appear to have editied since you dropped a discussion template on their page. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 19:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Jamesrajofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username and implied shared use. Adakiko (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment: It's not clear to me how the username implies shared use or how it's promotional as it seems to be a real name. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 03:51, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
ThadeusOfNazereth "Official" in a username leaves room for a spokesperson/representative to operate the account in the named person's name(i.e. "PopeFrancisOfficial"; "BarackObamaOfficial") with the named person or other representatives. We usually don't worry about this unless the named person has an article. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Super Agent 363 YT (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Per contribution. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
CFW - Culture Funding Watch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as they are promoting their company. They have also admitted on their talk page that they are a company. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Please don't report users you have engaged in discussion; either report or discuss. 331dot (talk) 16:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Hamropustanp (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Hamropusta. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:34, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Currenttrendsbl (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – adding links to currenttrends.in 81.2.123.64 (talk) 16:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Mpopoma sports academy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Akshit5555 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as it contains profanity. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. That's a real name from Sanskrit. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:28, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Landsalelk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
MRS Studio (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Nigg~enwiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ (he/they) Talk to me 21:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Niga~enwiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ (he/they) Talk to me 21:33, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Marco Asensio

Marco Asensio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to BLP due to subject being in the news regarding a potential transfer. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 12:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Opinion polling for the 2025 Polish presidential election

Opinion polling for the 2025 Polish presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Octilllion (talk) 12:40, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:56, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Changkat Keruing

Changkat Keruing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Back and forth dispute with an IP editor who seems to view my language templates for Chinese terms and removal of the existence of a film as a reference to...itself as "vandalism". I'd like to nip this simmering edit war in the bud. They have already come to my talk page to yell at me about it without making any material improvements to the page, which I have done in the form of references, language templates, a new section, and removing unreferenced material. Kazamzam (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Ivan Drago

Ivan Drago (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continually adding unsupported/unreferenced information after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 14:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Government Titumir College

Government Titumir College (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 15:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Lenny Kravitz

Lenny Kravitz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Semi didn't work @Daniel Case:. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 13enedict (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Julie Dawn Cole

Julie Dawn Cole (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper repeatedly adding unsourced diplomat claims. Jalen Barks (Woof) 16:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

National Thanksgiving Turkey Presentation

National Thanksgiving Turkey Presentation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 17:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Jagirani

Jagirani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: because anyone cant edit page info Jagirani110 (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Mary Kay Bergman

Mary Kay Bergman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Disruption from an auto-confirmed account and an IP (possibly a sockpuppet) who persist with copyright violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Question: Is this still an issue now that the copyrighted image has been deleted from commons? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Khan Sir

Khan Sir (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Frequent disruptive edits by anonymous IP users. The subject's birthplace is not officially disclosed, yet multiple users are repeatedly changing it without any reliable sources. This has led to persistent vandalism. To prevent further unsourced changes, semi-protection is requested. AstuteFlicker (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

2011 Cullman–Arab tornado

2011 Cullman–Arab tornado (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. E_F⁵ 18:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

2011 Super Outbreak

2011 Super Outbreak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. E_F⁵ 18:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Poop

Poop (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Vandalism is a huge issue. People are repeatedly adding the heading "You, you are poop". This has happened at least 20 times. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:31, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

List of the busiest airports in Europe

List of the busiest airports in Europe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Because we have arrived at a new year, all the entries are being actively updated for 2024. Unfortunately, a number of novice editors (some of them possibly violating COI), are making mistakes in their haste to update their favourite local airport. Ok, I'm being harsh, but even Assuming Good Faith, this article is sustaining damage. It either needs protection, or extra eyes on every new edit. Meanwhile I am repairing whatever I can find, but my own editing skills are limited. There is also a decade-long edit-war regarding the definition of "Europe". Airports in Turkey, Cyprus, Madeira, the Canary Islands, and Russia are involved. Please help! WendlingCrusader (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Bill Cipher

Bill Cipher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FifthFive (talk) 20:33, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Qubo

Qubo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Return of endemic vandalism regarding the network's false return to the air and a hallucinated history; see 177.89.183.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Nate • (chatter) 20:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Somalia

Somalia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: is there incorrect information that needs to be corrected. Mahmood2026 (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Even disregarding that this is in a contentious topic, this article was constantly protected over the years before its most recent and indefinite protection three years ago. Use the talk page to suggest edits or talk with El C to see if he is willing to lift protection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Bangladesh

Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: been enable iPhone lost mod 103.109.59.41 (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined Incomprehensible reasoning. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft talk:Kevin Marino

Draft talk:Kevin Marino (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Kevin marino 96.93.159.29 (talk) 18:45, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined No reasoning given. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

History of the Kurds

History of the Kurds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The protection isn't necessary because the article is in really bad shape and needs a lot of improvement. There's a ton of original research, and I checked seven sources, none of them support the claims in the article. Some of it is also unsourced or just poorly written. I won’t go into every issue here because it would take too long, about 50% of the article needs work. I’m not suggesting full removal of protection, as that could lead to further problems just a reduction to allow for constructive edits. 185.187.78.216 (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Shortcut

WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Gaza genocide

Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Gaza genocide

Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add info about 35 year reduction in life expectancy according to UPenn study http://www.thedp.com/article/2025/01/penn-study-gaza-life-expectancy-drop Seahumidity (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Gaza war

Gaza war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to talk the on discussion page about the name of the conflict Xenomire (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

No. Get some experience editing topic areas that aren't contentious first. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 06:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request

v·h

Page	Tagged since	Protection level	Last protection log entry
Module:Disambiguation (request)	2025-01-18 20:46	Fully protected (log)	Modified by Pppery on 2023-09-01: "Upping to full protection as now used by Module:Pagetype"

Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

10 template-protected edit requests

v·h

Page	Tagged since	Protection level	Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox sports league (request)	2025-01-25 22:16	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Post-nominals/GBR (request)	2025-01-30 07:35	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Ivanvector on 2019-10-25: "Highly visible template: change to TE protection per request and consensus"
Template:Photo requested (request)	2025-01-30 17:02	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-01-20: "highly visible template"
Module:Sports color/baseball (request)	2025-01-31 16:06	Template-protected (log)	Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Infobox Korean name (request)	2025-02-01 00:33	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Very long (request)	2025-02-01 09:18	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Mjroots on 2021-02-10: "Highly visible template: Per req at WP:RFPP"
Template:Db-imagepage (request)	2025-02-01 17:35	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Oshwah on 2019-06-15: "Used by Twinkle and Huggle to warn users. This is a high risk point for potential large-scale disruption if vandalized."
Template:TwoLeg start (request)	2025-02-01 20:25	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Subinfobox bodystyle (request)	2025-02-01 23:58	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Graeme Bartlett on 2015-12-13: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Editnotices/Page/PROTECT Kids Act (request)	2025-02-02 09:51	Title blacklist (log)	Matching line: `Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit\|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>`

Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Ojsyork

Ojsyork (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SDGB1217

SDGB1217 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:C1K98V

C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede 66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede 66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede 66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Walco1

Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

S-Aura (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards.

I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User:बडा काजी

बडा काजी (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda ^Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Иованъ

Иованъ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Feralpearl

Feralpearl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

As part of NPP, I've reviewed and article of there's, and then checked their other recent pages. They produce appropriately referenced, well-written, and appropriately formatted pages. Klbrain (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done. User:Feralpearl, thanks for all your new articles, in general they look to be in decent shape. I'm not granting as I'm seeing too many instances of non-cited content, for instance on the date of death in Ann Harithas, and citations to ancentry.com, which is generally unreliable. You can highlight these unreliable sources to yourself using scripts such as User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter. Other very minor squabbles: per MOS:ORDER, external links need to come after references (Jeanette Vondersaar), you underlink your articles quite a bit, and leads of longer articles should be at least a few sentences long.

Feel free to apply yourself (including by leaving me a message on my talk page) when you've got another few articles under your belt: you're clearly on the right track! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestions! I'll clear up the issues you've mentioned and take heed of your guidance in the future. Feralpearl (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Yeshivish613

Yeshivish613 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

It would be helpful to use this tool so I can quickly do otherwise tedious tasks. In the past I've spent a lot of time adding a new navbox to a bunch of pages, this would make it a lot quicker. Yeshivish613 (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.
Confirmed [edit] Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests)

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:AsmarTiba

AsmarTiba (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, long time user of Wikipedia here, with a relatively new account which has less than 500 edits, while I was working on translating an article about an Israeli nurse and women's rights activist שרה לשנסקי (Sara Lishansky) from Hebrew to English. I noticed that I was only able to publish my translation as draft, What are my options in this case? AsmarTiba (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

P.S. I have previously done translation from English to Hebrew, I figured this limitation only applies when translating to English. AsmarTiba (talk) 11:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done, looks like you managed to get your article to mainspace. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ivan 6

Ivan 6 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I'd like to translate some articles that are currently only available in Russian and not in English. The machine translation feature is not yet available to me, but I'd like to help in that area. Ivan 6 (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

P.S. I'm familiar with Russian and fluent in Bulgarian which are both of the slavic language family. Ivan 6 (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done however, you may try the content translation tool by changing the new title to start with "Draft:" here. — xaosflux ^Talk 10:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, but translation features do not work for me even under "Draft:". This is why I requested permission in the first place. Ivan 6 (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

User:MediaGuy768

MediaGuy768 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am an aviation industry member and expert and would like to edit some articles involving aviation and add maps, clarification in some text, and even existing photos to some areas. MediaGuy768 (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Not done None of those things require Extended confirmed. If any articles you wish to edit are protected, you can request edits on the talk page. Donald Albury 14:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Boutboul

Boutboul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:

1. "You have added translated content from other Wikipedias without attribution."

2. "You have artificially split your article contributions into separate edits to more quickly reach a high edit count."

1. Translated content without attribution

In October 2024, I misunderstood the rules regarding proper attribution for translated content. Since January 2025, I believe I have consistently included proper attribution in all my edit summaries, as demonstrated in these examples: here, here or here.

2. Split article contributions

Regarding this concern, I would like to clarify that my first 350 edits, made between 2006 and 2013, occurred before the 500 edits rule was introduced (2016). These edits could not have been intended to meet a requirement that did not exist at the time.

I acknowledge that I intentionally split my contributions to reach the 500 edits threshold, only for the remaining 150 contributions needed to meet this target.

However, since then, I have made over 700 additional contributions (~1200 in total) without splitting them. This can be seen in my average edit size, which is approximately 350 bytes and aligns with averages observed among contributors, including administrators.

I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). — MusikBot ^talk 15:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Tashmetu

Tashmetu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hi, My Extended confirmed permission was revoked last December because the arbitration committee deemed my contributions to be majority minor edits. I have since made between 150-200 edits that are more substantial, I would like to now appeal and have my permission restored. Tashmetu (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). — MusikBot ^talk 15:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Not done. The AC said you could appeal after 500 substantative edits. Furthermore, many of you additions are adding citations to one WP:unreliable source: www.catholic-hierarchy.org. Could you revert those changes and add reliable sources instead. You can install User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter to help you identify unreliable sources if you cannot determine reliability yourself. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I thought the 500 is in total and includes my previous edits before my permission was revoked, because they weren't all minor edits. I will try to fix the reference issue, I had no idea. unfortunately to make my edits more substantive I kept making several changes per edit and so simply reverting them won't be possible . But I'll try anyway, thanks for the advice. Tashmetu (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

That is a good point. According to Xtools, you've made some 220 non-minor edits. However, I see you've tagging edits as WP:minor that are not according to Wikipedia's definition. For instance, this edit where you added a source should not have been marked as minor and was substantative instead. Please have a look at what should be marked as minor in its guideline and adjust accordingly. If we instead look at edits of >20 bytes, we get to ~310 edits. We're still a bit too early for regranting the permission in my books therefore. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Not tagging adding references as minor edits is something that I should have known about since I've read the page you mentioned but slipped my mind as I was being extra cautious of being accused again of gaming the system. Thank you for the advice, I'll work on learning from my mistakes and sorry for wasting your time. Tashmetu (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Respublica-23

Respublica-23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights I'm the alt of Scratchinghead and im requesting the ec for this. If not, then it's okey and i will get rid of this account and switch to just using my main one. Respublica-23 (talk) 15:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Respublica-23: could you confirm this from your main account? Happy to grant it when that's done. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay ☢️SCR@TCH!NGH3@D (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Upon looking a bit deeper, why did @Respublica-23 claim to be a new user when they created their user page ([6]). That seems dishonest if this is a WP:VALIDSOCK. Could you explain why you have need of a second account? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I would normally be inclined to just say "meh" and grant the user right anyway, but the account this is an alt of had EC removed for cause in December and only got it back a few weeks ago. That, combined with the concern brought up by Femke, makes me question if this is a good idea. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 21:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

To be honest i dont really need it, I could be fine without it So I withdraw my applications Respublica-23 (talk) 14:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

backup account Respublica-23 (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Eh i put up a random description

Since I read the policy on valid socks I changed it to "alt of scratchinghead" Respublica-23 (talk) 14:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Not done While I agree that "meh" is usually the right attitude here, I don't think the benefits outweight the potential negatives here. A backup account is not one of the reasons given in VALIDALT. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:05, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:GrabUp

GrabUp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 07:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. SilverLocust 💬 08:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Rodney Baggins

Rodney Baggins (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

User:ViridianPenguin

ViridianPenguin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been editing for over five years with 2.2K mainspace edits, which includes over 30 new articles. In May 2024, Clovermoss gave me a three-month trial of the NPP permission, and I got the reviewer barnstar in that month's backlog drive. I sparingly used AFD and CSD during my reviewing, but that is mostly because when I found deficient articles, I spent the time to make them passable, rather than sending them for draftification/deletion. When I did propose content for deletion, I generally received community consensus to do so. I am seeking the permission for permanent use, but another trial works too! ViridianPenguin 🐧 ( 💬 ) 18:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User:DoctorWhoFan91

DoctorWhoFan91 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

My trial of 2 months is ending soon, so I would like to be granted the permission permanently. I know that I have made mistakes while reviewing (though nothing close to egregious), so in case it would be another trial, I can ask later, as I might or might not be busy this month. And thank you for providing me the trial, it's been fun, trying to help Wikipedia through npp. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 9 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 21:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Hounaam

Hounaam (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I would like to formally request the permanent assignment of the New Page Reviewer permission.

Since being granted this role on a trial basis, I have actively contributed to reviewing new pages, particularly those related to Iran, Persian language, and Persianate culture areas in which I have both expertise and a long-standing editorial commitment. In addition to evaluating new articles, I have assisted other authors in completing their work, providing guidance when they were unfamiliar with Wikipedia's guidelines. In cases where further intervention was needed, I took the initiative to edit the articles myself to ensure they met the necessary standards.

I believe my trial period as a New Page Reviewer have demonstrated my dedication to maintaining and improving Wikipedia’s content. I remain committed to collaborating with fellow editors and ensuring that new articles align with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I appreciate your time and consideration. Best regards, Hounaam (talk) 11:28, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 11:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Bluetime93

Bluetime93 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been a regular contributor to both the Turkish and English Wikipedia for many years. Based on the experience I have gained throughout this period, I aim to make more high-quality and sustainable contributions. I am particularly interested in articles related to transportation and believe that these articles require regular monitoring. My primary objectives include updating incorrect or incomplete content, performing page moves when necessary, and ensuring that these articles comply with Wikipedia standards. In this context, I am requesting the "page mover" right to address content deficiencies and errors while also helping to reduce the workload of other administrators. Thank you for your attention and support. --bluetime93 💬 11:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 1998 total edits. — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:BryceM2001

BryceM2001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Not at this time due to limited editing experience but please do apply again later. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ali Beary

Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary _{(talk2me!) (stalk me?!)} 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Protobowladdict

Protobowladdict (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting rollback rights because I spend most of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, and I would like to help fight vandals more effectively. I have made some mistakes, but I mostly have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and I try to always WP:AGF. Rollback will also allow me to use tools like AntiVandal. Thank you. Protobowladdict (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Vineyard93

Vineyard93 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Some newbie editors contain IP address not their username editing wrong and fake information even if is not the area origin. Vineyard93 (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done User:Vineyard93. I don't understand your request. You don't need rollback to revert fake information. If you encounter vandalism from IPs, you can warn the users. When they persist after sufficient warnings, you can report to WP:AIV. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

User:UndeadAnarchy

UndeadAnarchy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I have been working on counter-vandalism with RedWarn for a while now. Despite my inconsistent and relatively low edit count compared to other requesters, I believe I would be a good fit. I approach CV with the idea that it is better to have somebody with malicious intentions get away with their behavior than it is to accuse an innocent person of Vandalism. I aim for high accuracy over total reverts. I have made mistakes in the past but I am usually quick to notice and fix them. The main reason I am requesting Rollback is to gain experience with the Huggle desktop application. Thank you for the consideration and I look forward to hearing back. UndeadAnarchy|✉ 14:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Elli (talk | contribs) 03:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Rahmatula786

Rahmatula786 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to request rollback permission to help combat vandalism, particularly in Nepal-related articles, which I frequently come across while patrolling recent changes. Having rollback rights would allow me to efficiently revert obvious and disruptive edits, improving the quality of affected pages. I always assume good faith and am careful when reviewing edits. If I am uncertain whether an edit is vandalism, I do not revert it. I am also familiar with Wikipedia’s warning templates and know when it is appropriate to report persistent vandals to WP:AIV. I believe rollback will be a valuable tool in my efforts to maintain Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will use it responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Xiphoid Vigour

Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm requesting this right to revert vandalism from the all the articles on Wikipedia, especially India related articles. I'm also patrolling recent changes from when I started i.e. almost a month. Please remember to ping me if done Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 05:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 185 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Heeheemalu

Heeheemalu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been actively combating vandalism on Wikipedia for some time, especially Taiwan related articles. I regularly monitor recent changes and undo obvious vandalism while ensuring that good-faith edits are not mistakenly removed. Having rollback rights would allow me to revert vandalism more efficiently, especially on high-traffic pages. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies on vandalism, edit warring, and proper rollback usage, and I will use the tool responsibly to help maintain the integrity of the encyclopedia. Heeheemalu (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

User:ScrabbleTiles

ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hi, I would like to request rollback rights as I have been patrolling on Wikipedia for a while, finding vandals, and I would like to have the ability to use rollback to revert their edits more effectively (as I have had a couple where I had to undo lots of small edits and it took up lots of my time). Thanks, ScrabbleTiles (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 76 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 18:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Not done Hello User:ScrabbleTiles. Usually, we expect users to have at least 200 edits to mainspace. I would like to see you understand warnings a bit better for isntance before giving rollback. At User talk:OKTO on 6, you have a level-1 warning and only warning in rapid succession. Of course, a second warning can't be an only warning, so a level-2 warning would have been more appropriate (or none, as they may not have noticed the first warning immediately). In the meantime, you can already install WP:Twinkle to combat vandalism more effectively. You're on the right track, so feel free to come back in a few weeks when you've hit the threshold. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for that. I went straight to 4 because their edits were very disruptive and I didn’t see any constructive edit coming from them but in the future, I will be more forgiving. I will request again once I have reached the threshold. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 19:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

User:Pbritti

Pbritti (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been involved in combatting low-intensity disruption and vandalism for a while. I've recently encountered an increased level of sustained socks, LTAs, and contentious topic disruption. Having rollback would be just another tool in the toolkit, as I've enjoyed the luxury of Twinkle for a couple years. An even more streamlined approach to combatting disruption is always nice, though. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Requests for template editor

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Raph Williams65

Raph Williams65 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I request that I be given a right as a template editor, to edit templates protected. Am sure my edits will be pleasant to everyone, I have a strong password as required. I promise to respect the guidelines on editing templates. You can revew templates I my self have created here... – Raph Williams65 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Not done, you haven't met the guidelines for granting or demonstrated a need for this permission. The format in which you requested this also does not give me confidence that you will use the necessary level of care in, for example, checking a page's instructions (documentation in the case of a template) before editing. If there is a template you are unable to edit, please just use an edit request for now. SilverLocust 💬 13:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

This dashboard (talk)

Category tracker

Immediate requests

Category	Entries
Wikipedians looking for help	0
Requests for unblock	23
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	0
Candidates for speedy deletion	46
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	1

Deletion

Category	Entries
Articles for deletion	596
Templates for deletion	109
Categories for deletion	418
Wikipedia files for discussion	77
All redirects for discussion	455
Miscellaneous pages for deletion	11
Possible copyright violations	28
All articles proposed for deletion	243
All files proposed for deletion	17
Unsorted AfD debates	0
All files with the same name on Commons	2

Image copyright problems

Category	Entries
Orphaned non-free use	443
Unknown copyright status	71
Unknown source	29
No non-free use rationale	3
Replaceable non-free use images	15
Disputed non-free use images	49

Page protection

Category	Entries
Protected	10
Semi-protected user and user talk pages	1,274
Fully protected user and user talk pages	448
Protected against vandalism	4
Protected talk pages of blocked users	34
Semi-protected	2,286
Arbitration 500/30 restricted	0

Cleanup

Category	Entries	Percentage
General cleanup
All pages needing cleanup	34,513	0.5
All articles needing rewrite	6,093	0.09
All articles needing expert attention	1,340	0.02
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating	40,470	0.58
Reference problems
Category	Entries	Percentage
All pages needing factual verification	11,309	0.16
All articles with unsourced statements	539,519	7.76
All articles lacking sources	69,065	0.99
All unreferenced BLPs	10	0
All articles needing additional references	478,239	6.88
All articles needing references cleanup	4,653	0.07
All articles lacking in-text citations	105,728	1.52
All articles with dead external links	281,353	4.05
Image cleanup problems
Category	Entries	Percentage
Image files for cleanup	17	-
Wikipedia files lacking a description	136	-
Wikipedia files with unknown source	19	-
Other problems
Category	Entries	Percentage
All articles to be merged	1,213	0.02
All articles to be split	833	0.01
Unsorted Stubs	0	-
Stub categories	19,310	-
All uncategorized pages	725	0.01
All orphaned articles	54,723	0.79
All articles needing copy edit	2,301	0.03
All articles with style issues	19,291	0.28
All Wikipedia articles needing context	2,768	0.04
All articles that may contain original research	16,569	0.24

Miscellaneous

Category	Entries
Requested moves	437
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes	6,763
All accuracy disputes	15,758
Articles with invalid ISBNs	1
Articles with invalid ISSNs	4
All articles to be expanded	65,917

Special pages

Maintenance reports	Information
Broken redirects
Dead-end pages	Dead-end pages
Dormant pages	Dusty articles
DoubleRedirects	Double redirects
Lonely pages	Orphaned articles
Long pages
New pages	New page patrol
New pages feed	Page curation
Protected pages	Protection policy
Short pages
Uncategorized	Categorization
Uncategorized cats
Uncategorized templates
Unused categories
Unused files (images)
Unused templates
Without interwiki links
Most interwiki links

Sub-page listing

User:Winhunter/Userboxes

Hong Kong

Misc

Delete

Keep

Neutral

Oppose

Support

Note

Template

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter.

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

v t e Noticeboards
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Wikipedia noticeboards

Articles I...

Created

Expanded significantly

My other accounts

My bookmarks

Wikipedia

Category

Misc

Tools

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

User-reported

Current requests for increase in protection level

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Handled requests

Autopatrolled

AutoWikiBrowser

Confirmed

Extended confirmed

New page reviewer

Page mover

Pending changes reviewer

Rollback

Template editor

Immediate requests

Deletion

Image copyright problems

Page protection

Cleanup

Miscellaneous

Special pages

Sub-page listing

Hong Kong

Misc