Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Aga Khan IV in 2015
Aga Khan IV

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

Sections

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


February 9

[edit]

Super Bowl LIX

[edit]
Article: Super Bowl LIX (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In American football, the ( Kansas City Chiefs or Philadelphia Eagles ) defeat the (other team) to win the Super Bowl. (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Per WP:ITN/R and examples of these articles being found in previous ITNs. I understand this ITN may be postponed until after the completion of the game. Ahuman00 (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant support since I don't believe the American Hand-Egg Championships should be ITN/R, but, until such time as that's corrected, they are This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 07:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait then support. We will wait for the results and support as an ITN/R. Moraljaya67 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:39, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close notability isn't in doubt because it's ITN/R. It's not in a fit state to post until it says who wins and has a match summary, which won't be for over 16 hours. Therefore any debate is moot. We may as well start a nomination for the 2028 presidential election as that is on ITN/R. Unknown Temptation (talk) 10:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 8

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Sam Nujoma

[edit]
Article: Sam Nujoma (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times of India
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First President of Namibia Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ne Zha 2 breaks box office records

[edit]
Article: Ne Zha 2 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Chinese animated film Ne Zha 2 becomes the highest grossing film of all time in China and the highest grossing non-English language film of all time, grossing over $1 billion at the box office in just 12 days. (Post)
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Pretty historic box office accomplishments here, biggest non-English language film of all time and first to ever make $1B; article is in fairly poor shape however The Image Editor (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support The article is in OK shape (maybe needs a bit more details about the plot), the fact itself is pretty interesting.Trepang2 (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Box office (if not #1 in world) doesn't matter. Chinese films grossing higher and higher should be taken as a common event now. If there is something really special about it other than this, let us know. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 06:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lean oppose Breaking news: there's a lot of people in China. More at eleven. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Tabasco bus crash

[edit]
Article: 2025 Escárcega bus crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A bus crash kills 41 people in Escárcega, Mexico. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

 ArionStar (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. A bus crashed. This is not a significant event that merits coverage in an encyclopedia. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, as the article is a stub. If the article is improved, maybe I will change my vote to support, as we posted the 2024 Minas Gerais road crash in 2024. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have some experience in searching sources and improving articles. Going to sleep and back to work… 💤 ArionStar (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. A 25-word stub. (And Escárcega is in Campeche, not Tabasco.) Moscow Mule (talk) 04:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It says near Escárcega. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 05:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox says "near Escárcega, Tabasco". Fwiw, neither of the references say it occurred in Tabasco. Moscow Mule (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a near-literal bus plunge This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 07:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I have expanded the article since, from the one line it was before. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 07:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability. 41 deaths from a weird accident where identification of bodies has become difficult due to burns, a mystery why truck driver invaded the lane, international coverage, and importantly an improved article. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 10:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I have moved page 2025 Tabasco bus crash to 2025 Escárcega bus crash: Based on all the sources, it appears it happened in the outskirts of this city 'Escárcega' and Tobsco government is just taking active initiative in helping and providing information. Also changed the blurb and target article accordingly. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 10:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Dick Jauron

[edit]
Article: Dick Jauron (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former NFL head coach for the Bears and Bills. Klinetalkcontribs 18:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) Ongoing: M23 campaign (2022–present)

[edit]
Article: M23 campaign (2022–present) (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Article updated

Nominator's comments: it’s an ongoing conflict with escalation and many wiki editors have been consistently editing and updating the article Wafflefrites (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Article is of good quality and is definitely being updated regularly. I think at this point it’s pretty notable with the UN’s involvement and the M23’s advancements, so I won’t have a problem promoting this to ongoing mike_gigs talkcontribs 00:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per above. There is escalation with daily updates, and the article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 7

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: Tony Roberts (actor)

[edit]
Article: Tony Roberts (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP News: Stage and film actor Tony Roberts, who often starred in Woody Allen movies, dies at 85
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Jaguarnik (talk) 10:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Dafydd Elis-Thomas

[edit]
Article: Dafydd Elis-Thomas (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Welsh politician, life peer, former MP and leader of Plaid Cymru. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 21:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - one CN but that shouldn't completely stop this nom. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 23:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. There's more to be said (18 yrs at Westminster, propping up Callaghan in the Winter of Discontent and VoC, 1979 referendum...), but it's unobjectionable for RD as it stands. Llywydd Senedd Cymru, indeed. Moscow Mule (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 6

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Science and technology

  • NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies says that the probability of asteroid 2024 YR4 impacting Earth on 22 December 2032 has increased to 2.3%, or a (1-in-43) chance, following further observations of its trajectory. More observations are planned in the coming months to gather data on the asteroid before it moves too far away from Earth-based telescopes to be accurately observed. (The Guardian)

(Posted) RD: Virginia Halas McCaskey

[edit]
Article: Virginia Halas McCaskey (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chicago Tribune
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Owner of the Chicago Bears, 102. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Irv Gotti

[edit]
Article: Irv Gotti (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter (reliable), WBLS
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Imconfused3456 02:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement needed: It is currently orange tagged, and citations for discography section could be picked from the main article. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 09:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bering Air Flight 445

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Disappearance of Bering Air Flight 445 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A Cessna 208 Caravan (similar aircraft pictured) carrying ten people disappears over the Norton Sound, off the coast of Alaska in the United States. (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Since small plane flights are acceptable here. ArionStar (talk) 12:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No one died and this isn’t particularly notable Personisinsterest (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You don't know that though. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We're not even two months in and this is already a very bad year for aviation. Depending on what happens next I might give my support. Departure– (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Another small aircraft just crashed in São Paulo today, and killed two people. ArionStar (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Chorchapu. 64.114 etc 18:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not every plane crash needs ITN. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on notability. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 07:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. Not notable. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose due to the timing of the nomination and its phrasing – The article was nominated for ITN when the aircraft had disappeared off radar and when search and rescues were still being conducted. This should have been nominated after more information was known, at least waiting one or two more days before doing so. Now that the aircraft's wreckage has been found, a renomination or amendment to the nomination can be made, because, as it stands, the nomination is clearly outdated. As to whether I would support it, I'm still unsure. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support 10+ deaths, no concrete reason for why the plane went down. Scuba 18:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this was postable any how, would we not have posted it if the reason was known? 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 21:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 5

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


2025 Southeast Europe retail boycotts

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Southeast Europe retail boycotts (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A series of boycotts (flyer pictured) against retail stores begin in Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Albania. (Post)
Alternative blurb: A series of boycotts (flyer pictured) against retail stores expands to several countries in Southeast Europe.
News source(s): IntelliNews; The Straits Times; DW; Euronews; Baklan Insight
Credits:

 ArionStar (talk) 04:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is of sufficient notability and quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the above. 64.114 etc 04:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - No one cares about a bunch of people boycotting some small supermarket retail in the Balkans. Nestle has had an active boycott of over 40 years yet we dont cover it ever. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the supermarket retail is small, a boycott where 89.5% of a country is participating is still notable. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait, leaning oppose - At the moment, we're only seeing the proposed action, not the impact. Calling for a boycott is easy; making change with one is difficult. (Which is why people are still boycotting Nestle after 40 years - it's had minimal effect on policy.) I'm not against this in principle, but we'd need to see it actually achieve something. GenevieveDEon (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Government measures are being introduced all the time. Some of them didn’t pay off, so the boycotts call for different measures. This is well-covered in the article.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support This doesn't seem all that notable to me, but it did have an impact on prices, so I guess. Personisinsterest (talk) 12:38, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose for now. Currently the article only discusses the direct impact of the boycotts in Croatia, not any other countries. Until we see how it impacts nations on a wider scale I don’t know if this is notable enough to post. I also feel like the article is a big vague in places about what exactly is being boycotted and thwart the impacts have been. mike_gigs talkcontribs 14:59, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The boycott in other countries just started on January 30… Let's wait for updates. ArionStar (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on Quality. I think the article could use some fleshing out of it's constituent sections. One small concern I have is not every country's section makes mention of the chains being boycotted. I understand it's a very broad boycott, but mentioning specific chains would probably better inform readers on the exact scope of the boycotts. Just my two cents, not a massive concern. DarkSide830 (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's better now. ArionStar (talk) 00:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why was this moved from Feb 1 to Feb 5? The only change from an event standpoint is the addition of Albania to this. This feels like gaming this nomination, particularly as there is really no initiating event that we can really point to as the start of all this. --Masem (t) 01:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ironic and MtPenguinMonster. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 08:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as a pretty significant response to rising prices, but I do have to point out that the article is in some need of tidying up. Yo.dazo (talk) 08:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Remove Slovenia from the blurb, even if there were calls for boycott, this is not getting media attention in the country and it is not getting much tracking. Croatia is another story, this is top news there. --Tone 13:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the alt blurb is better and summarize all the countries involved. ArionStar (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb per ArionStar and Yo.dazo. FlipandFlopped 15:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support (either blurb, but the one the lists the countries is preferred) The article is now in good enough state, especially given that the event is ongoing. It covers all the basic facts, has sufficient context, and is actively updated with new developments. I also think this is a highlight of the enwiki's ability to cover well non-Anglophone news, and I think this is a remarkable direct consumer action, regardless of whether it ultimately succeeds or fails to move the retail prices. Melmann 16:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the alt blurb, this article seems good enough and this is a notable event. User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 20:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality; the article struggles to distinguish between facts and rumours, and between one-day actions and indefinite ones; it also struggles to maintain NPOV. 217.180.228.171 (talk) 01:11, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Searching the news for "boycott", I find all sorts of other boycott stories – cricket, Tesla, Coca-Cola, etc. I have to go to the second page of hits to find this story. But it's not the only boycott in the Balkans as there's also a story that "Serb party ends boycott to fight Kosovo election". So, I'm not convinced this stands out in the news. And current readership of the article is tiny – less than 1,000 views per day – which also indicates that it's not prominent. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It makes front page news in Croatia in all local reliable sources, every time. Melmann 10:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Brian Turner

[edit]
Article: Brian Turner (New Zealand poet) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Radio New Zealand
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Mr. Lechkar (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sally J. Novetzke

[edit]
Article: Sally J. Novetzke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: U.S. ambassador to Malta during George H.W. Bush administration. Sources are good, but could use expansion. wizzito | say hello! 15:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Death of Mihir Ahammed

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Death of Mihir Ahammed (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A 15-year-old school student in Kochi, Kerala committed suicide after being brutally ragged. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Teenager commits suicide in Kochi India after being subjected to brutally ragging
News source(s): Times of India NDTV Mathrubhumi Thenewsminute
Credits:
 Spworld2 (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Impeachment of Sara Duterte

[edit]

Nominator's comments: A major political event in the Philippines with continued consequences. ArionStar (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now, The Senate still have no vote for the impeachment trial, and it is ongoing as for today. We should wait for until senate concluded all votes if whether impeached or not because Sara Duterte still a vice president based on the report on GMA Integrated News on the news of 24 Oras by Sec. Gen. Reginald Velasco. ROY is WAR Talk! 12:22, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Soft oppose while this is really big news for Filipino politics, Sara is just the VP. ITN is for changes to heads of state/government, she is neither. Scuba 22:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let me quote for this on what he said:

Once it's approved, it's transmitted to the Senate of the Philippines. — Sec. Gen. Reginald Velasco

Sir, that means [Sara Duterte] the Vice President is impeached? —GMA Integrated News

Yeah, yeah. Well, the word is impeached. But of course, she has to be tried by the Senate, no? — Sec. Gen. Reginald Velasco

Yes, sir. So even if she's impeached and not yet convicted by the Senate... — GMA Integrated News

She is still the sitting Vice President. — Sec. Gen. Reginald Velasco

GMA Integrated News ROY is WAR Talk! 12:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duterte has been impeached but is not yet convicted. Similarly, the impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol was posted although Yoon is still the sitting South Korean president, and his case is still pending in the Constitutional Court. 360kong (talk) 12:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, i see that. However, I think they need that votes on Senate of the Philippines since they are the only one need to be concluded. To be summarized, Senate will have a impeachment trial for that, but, Senate have adjourned until June 2. ROY is WAR Talk! 12:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. ITN had posted when Merceditas Gutierrez was impeached (which is what happened here), and when Renato Corona was convicted. ITN did not post the impeachment of Andres Bautista. Duterte is the highest official impeached when ITN is a thing. Wait until the Senate's final vote. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:58, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Simona Halep retirement

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Simona Halep (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Romanian tennis player Simona Halep announces her retirement. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Romanian sportswoman Simona Halep retires from tennis.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Romanian former No. 1 tennis player Simona Halep announces her retirement from the sport.
News source(s): (Bein Sports)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: figurative sportswoman female QalasQalas (talk) 06:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 4

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted Blurb) Blurb/RD: Aga Khan IV

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Aga Khan IV (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  The 49th imam of Nizari Isma'ilism, Aga Khan IV (pictured), dies at the age of 88, with his son becoming Aga Khan V. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The 49th imam of Nizari Isma'ilism, Aga Khan IV (pictured), dies at the age of 88 and is succeeded by his son, Aga Khan V.
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Mooonswimmer 22:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose blurb, not that well known or transformative figure. BilboBeggins (talk) 10:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready Support 17 cn. solved Grimes2 (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment - anyone want to propose a blurb/altblurb ? EdwardLane (talk) 12:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb - I'm amazed that anyone seriously suggested one. Not ready for RD because there are substantial sourcing issues in the article. The quality isn't far off, but there are still too many cn tags and unsourced statements. Modest Genius talk 12:35, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    To clarify, he was mostly known as a rich socialite and racehorse owner, who happened to have also inherited a ceremonial position in a religious sect. His religious activities seem to have mostly been limited to goodwill visits. Modest Genius talk 18:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Support RD, article quality is now fine. I still oppose a blurb. Modest Genius talk 13:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality (and if/when quality gets there I oppose a blurb) mike_gigs talkcontribs 14:22, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality. Once improved, I'd support blurb. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb - well known and transformative figure. It's certainly on top of the front page of the big newspapers here. I'm a bit surprised that anyone would suggest we not blurb such a major religious leader. Nfitz (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • If there is going to be a blurb then Nizari Ismaili should be a single wikilink to Nizari Isma'ilism. He wasnt the head of the entire branch of Ismaili Shia Islam, and the chainlink makes it appear as though he was. nableezy - 16:07, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose until the article is improved, then I support a RD but oppose a blurb. User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 17:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb as it is not very clear (via sourced discussion) of the legacy or impact he had, but that might be possible to add. Oppose RD due to numerous tags. Also question the need of the "The imam in Nizari Ismailism" section, that's nothing to do with the bio. Masem (t) 17:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Masem, IMHO, even if religious leaders (such as not only an Aga Khan, but also for example a Pope, Orthodox Patriarch, or a Dalai Lama) may not have been particularly objectively impactful or memorable, the nature of religion is such that the death of the leader of a faith will nonetheless have a global impact on millions of people who are in deep mourning. This impact is the primary source of notability, as opposed to any individual item on a legacy list - even though the Aga Khan IV has a few of those too. FlipandFlopped 19:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Simply being a religious leader of millions doesn't show any legacy or impact, particularly if they just simply filled that roll and did little beyond that. Same would be true for a world leader of a large nation. Take the recent blurb of Jimmy Carter, where the reason the blurb passed was not for what he did as President, but what he did for humanitarian aid outside his term. Show that there is documented legacy that was more that just filling the leadership roll, and a blurb might be reasonable. — Masem (t) 19:09, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Millions of people did not subscribe to a faith system where they felt a strong spiritual connection to Jimmy Carter as the spiritual embodiment and successor of their God. There is an important and inherent difference there: you can reasonably debate the impacts of a politician, but when a cherished religious leader dies, to say "So what? I, Masem, see nothing special about him", completely misses the point. It is not the average Wikipedian who is mourning, it is millions of Ismaili Muslims under their faith system, and that's the whole point of the blurb. FlipandFlopped 19:17, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If by his leadership he brought millions of new followers to their faith, and that can be evidenced and documented, that may help. But taking leadership of what already had millions of followers and lacking any growth is just someone doing their role in the faith, and doesn't make them a major figure. — Masem (t) 19:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Take the recent blurb of Jimmy Carter, where the reason the blurb passed was not for what he did as President, but what he did for humanitarian aid outside his term. I don't think many made that argument for the blurb discussion of Jimmy Carter. Most took his blurbing as a foregone conclusion, as the death of a US president is inherently notable, and reported by news sources around the world. They may have wanted to add his other work in the blurb, but his humanitarian aid was not what necessarily made him notable. Natg 19 (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb on notability. I am honestly quite surprised at the oppose votes. First, he is the figurehead and spiritual leader of millions of Ismaili Muslims. Just at a basic level, that significant global impact his death is having on those millions of people is enough to merit a blurb. But on top of that, the Aga Khan was a uniquely notable religious leader - unusually, he was both a religious leader and a billionaire who had impacts on everything from Canadian political scandals to competitive horse racing to a de facto power struggle with the Tajik government over control of an entire subset of the country. To me, this is speedy blurb material. FlipandFlopped 18:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support blurb per arguments above, but oppose on quality due to unresolved orange tag. The Kip (contribs) 18:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb. Not a transformative world leader of the Mandela/Thatcher mould.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The blurb would be justified on the basis of his being the spiritual leader of one of the main branches of Islam. Religious leaders at that level are typically blurbed if the article quality is adequate. Unfortunately, as of this comment it is not. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb on principle, oppose on quality Based on the current blurb standard, the Aga Khan meets that standard, having been the spiritual leader of well over ten million Muslims for over 60 years, a significant length of time. Other countries appeared to treat the Aga Khan almost like a foreign head of state, per the article. However, the article quality is not good enough and it doesn't look like it's going to be good enough in time for an RD, never mind a blurb. NorthernFalcon (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Updated blurb to mention the new Aga Khan V. --SpectralIon 04:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment 11-12 total support votes and 7 total oppose votes on notability (including weak/leaners). Widespread quality concerns among all. I will try to take a stab at improving the CN and orange tags later tonight, but it would be helpful to a consensus decision on notability if those who were on the fence or weak in their stance could reassess once improvements are made. FlipandFlopped 20:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've taken care of most of the outstanding CN tags. 3 remain. Mooonswimmer 20:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All remaining CN tags have been dealt with. Pinging users who explicitly opposed on quality and asking that you reassess your oppose on quality + clarify your vote on blurb notability if applicable: Moscow Mule, Chaotic Enby, Patar knight, Grimes2, SpectralIon, Mike gigs, TDKR Chicago 101, Chorchapu, Masem, The Kip, NorthernFalcon. FlipandFlopped 01:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m fine with the quality now, and I maintain my support on notability. SpectralIon 02:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Quality looks fine for me too. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I now support the RD and support a blurb, as he seems very important in Nizari Isma'ilism. User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 02:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Important is underselling, since he is literally the head of Nizari Ismailism. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Much improved, well done, everyone. Good to go. No opinion about RD vs. blurb. Moscow Mule (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the quality is now sufficient to support RD. I still oppose a blurb. Modest Genius talk 13:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It looks like he is more famous for being billionaire and philantropist, and also stepson of Rita Hayworth, than for being religious leader, doesn't it? BilboBeggins (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The development network he set up definitely gives him outsized influence compared to the size of the community, but the philanthropy is probably only possible through the tithing system. As for being the stepson of Rita Hayworth, there were reasons why his father was passed over in the imamate succession. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Risbergska school shooting

[edit]
Article: 2025 Risbergska school shooting (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Five people are shot and injured during a mass shooting at a school in Örebro, Sweden, while the perpetrator is found dead. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least eleven people are killed in a mass shooting at an adult education centre in Örebro, Sweden.
News source(s): CNNBBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Highly unusual that it was a firearm rather than a knife, is on the news here. Koltinn (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Police have confirmed about 10 dead so far. This appears to be the deadliest mass shooting in Swedish history. Johndavies837 (talk) 17:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a school for adults, Komvux. But the police has just confirmed there are "some 10" dead including the shooter plus the injured persons. They are busy with identifying, but will likely not release any more info until tomorrow. Cart (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I missed your ping. Yes, time for waiting is gone. Blurb is okay. Maybe update if there's the inevitable tightening of gun rules that invariably quickly follows this kind of event. Nfitz (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to disappoint, there won't be any such debate. Unlike the US we already have extremely strict gun laws, there are tons of rules and regulations before you can even think of owning a gun in Sweden. The problem is all the illegal and smuggled weapons. Cart (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - significant mass shooting, 10 deaths. Rare in Sweden. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - 10 deaths is very rare for a shooting in Sweden. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support decent and notable enough. ArionStar (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, and link "an adult education centre" to Campus Risbergska. - Sebbog13 (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 18:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 3

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Paul Plishka

[edit]
Article: Paul Plishka (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): operawire
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Legendary operatic bass who performed at the Met (Metropolitan Opera in New York City) from 1967 to 2018, #10 of their singers by number of performances, and he also performed at major locations and festivals in Europe, the U.S. and Chile. The article had not a single link to an opera, - tough. Also few references. - It's still missing links to colleagues and conductors, and references for some recordings. If we don't find them, we could live without those recordings. There's an obit in the New York Times that I can't access, - anybody who can read it, please help. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prime minister of Belgium

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Bart De Wever (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Bart De Wever (pictured) becomes prime minister of Belgium following the 2024 Belgian federal election. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ 239 days after the 2024 Belgian federal election, Bart De Wever becomes the prime minister of Belgium.
Alternative blurb II: Bart De Wever (pictured) becomes prime minister of Belgium following the 2024 Belgian federal election.
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

 ArionStar (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also you should probably change the article to Bart De Wever. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 13:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Sal Maida

[edit]
Article: Sal Maida (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hollywood Reporter
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death reported 3 February. Thriley (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rich Dauer

[edit]
Article: Rich Dauer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [4]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Lim Tze Peng

[edit]
Article: Lim Tze Peng (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Straits Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Receipient of the Cultural Medallion of Singapore, the highest national award given to art practitioners in Singapore. – robertsky (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Barbie Hsu

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Barbie Hsu (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (pictured) dies at the age of 48 from pneumonia. (Post)
News source(s): BBC South China Morning Post
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 04:44, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have quality concerns and strongly oppose a blurb. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 04:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I also nominated separately at about the same time. Combining here, with my nomination statement: A household name among the various Chinese speaking populations in many countries as the variety shows that she had hosted are exported to the various countries. IIRC, nothing ground breaking from her works that may warrant a blurb. News of her death just released (3 Feb). At nomination time, the article is in a bad shape, i.e. dated biographical layout; lack of references in the Works section; prose is not as expanded as it can be; lots of dating news. Will be working on this later in the night. – robertsky (talk) 04:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for sniping the RD nomination :). I'm from a Chinese family so can confirm the "household name" part. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with household name part, and the certainly unexpected death at the age of 48 warrants a blurb in my opinion, if the quality can be fixed. starship.paint (talk / cont) 11:09, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reuters: Barbie Hsu, who rose to fame across East Asia
Agence France-Presse: Barbie Hsu, who was hugely popular across Asia
BBC: One of the biggest stars in the Mandarin-speaking world, Hsu became a familiar face even in the Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand after Meteor Garden was dubbed in local languages.starship.paint (talk / cont) 11:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Updated. – robertsky (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Dismantling of United States Agency for International Development

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominator's comments: Wide news coverage, large impact on US foreign policy. Eyesinthefire (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Victor Menezes

[edit]
Article: Victor Menezes (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [10] [11]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Srf123 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2025 Sheffield school stabbing

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2025 Sheffield school stabbing (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A boy is stabbed to death in All Saints Catholic High School, Sheffield, England. (Post)
News source(s): [12] [13]
Credits:

Article updated
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 2

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Helga de Alvear

[edit]
Article: Helga de Alvear (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RTVE
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Influential German-born gallerist who opened a great museum of modern art to share her collection with the public. Article was mostly there, references added. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Harry Stewart Jr.

[edit]
Article: Harry Stewart Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: US Air Force Tuskegee airman SpencerT•C 19:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Brian Murphy

[edit]
Article: Brian Murphy (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English actor/comedian. Article is not ready yet for the usual reasons. Black Kite (talk) 12:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Marion Wiesel

[edit]
Article: Marion Wiesel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 05:55, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Grammy Awards

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 67th Annual Grammy Awards (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At the Grammy Awards, Kendrick Lamar's "Not Like Us" wins Record of the Year, while Beyoncé's Cowboy Carter wins Album of the Year. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At the Grammy Awards, Kendrick Lamar's "Not Like Us" wins Song of the Year and Record of the Year, Beyoncé's Cowboy Carter wins Album of the Year, and Chappell Roan (pictured) wins Best New Artist.
News source(s): CBS News
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Article is not close to being ready due to lack of prose about the ceremony itself (its all just tables). Masem (t) 05:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but I think the article needs some cleaning up. More ceremony information would be nice. And, agreeing with @DecafPotato, the blurb would be better without the SOTY and Best New Artist mentions. There should be a photo of Kendrick. AndrewGarfieldIsTheBestSpiderMan (talk) 02:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and remove from ITNR. Theres way too much pop culture that isnt "news" featured here. nableezy - 04:43, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's called "In the News", not "News", as we feature a wide range of topics across all knowledge areas as long as they reported in the news and of quality. Not that the current article here is of quality, but the Grammys are considered the pinnacle of contemporary music recognition, and completely fair for areas that WP covers. --Masem (t) 04:58, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      I’m well aware of what it’s called, and I’m well aware of your position on what this section of the main page should feature, and I disagree. It is a trade show, voted on by a some 13,000 people, and it is as interesting or engaging as the latest episode of Keeping up with the Kardashians or whatever their latest show is called. No serious encyclopedia would feature the yearly awards show of such a scale in such a way. Cover it sure, but blurbed on the main page? Pass. nableezy - 06:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support first blurb - well cited and ready.BabbaQ (talk) 11:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - there is still virtually no prose about the ceremony or winners. Almost all of the existing prose in the article was there prior to Sunday. Please stop marking this as ready until updates are made. mike_gigs talkcontribs 18:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb I think mentioning the new artist award is the most "news" component about it (her being literally "new", in the name of the award, corresponding to "ITN"...). Neutral/weak support current article on the quality issue, as I disagree that needing a ton of prose beyond "who won what" is strictly necessary for the article to meet minimum standards. People can go the article for the artist or for the song/album if they want to learn more about it. FlipandFlopped 03:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support put it in already Personisinsterest (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 World Men's Handball Championship

[edit]
Article: 2025 World Men's Handball Championship (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In handball, Denmark defeat Croatia to win the World Men's Handball Championship. (Post)
News source(s): Olympics
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Moraljaya67 (talk) 23:44, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Tony Martin

[edit]
Article: Tony Martin (farmer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British farmer at the centre of self-defence with firearms case  The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: